24th - 25th April 2012

Hotel Palace Berlin

day one | day two

Day One24th April 2012
08:00
Registration and Refreshments
08:55
Chair's Opening Remarks

Andreas Schneider, Vice President Life Science Alliances, Roche Diagnostics & Co-Chair Global PAT Data Management Team, ISPE Switzerland
09:00
Lessons Learnt from the FDA QBD Pilot Programme
Case study: Merck Serono

Dr. Pascal Valax, Group Head, Biotech Process Sciences, Merck Serono S.A Switzerland
09:40
Building Quality Earlier in The Process
Fully optimising processes by implementing QbD earlier in development
  • Moving away from empirical approaches to process design which are fundamentally contradictory to QbD
  • Successfully building QbD earlier into process development and defining process steps
  • Developing robust processes earlier in the development timeline and ensuring processes stay robust later in the development trajectory

Dr. Alessandro Butte, Head of DSP, Lonza Switzerland
10:20
Using a Criticality Assessment Approach to Assign Criticality and Linking Those Decisions to Registered Details
Approaches will be illustrated via a small molecule API case study
  • Assessing, detectability, severity and probability
  • Using scorability to decide what's critical and what needs to be filed for regulatory review

Dr. John R Donaubauer, Director, Scientific Affairs Development Sciences Process R&D, Abbott USA
11:00
Networking and Refreshment Break
11:30
Using a Clearly Articulated Control Strategy to Respond to Regulatory Expectations
Clarifying regulatory uncertainty and successfully filing to satisfy regulatory QbD expectations with a clearly defined control strategy
  • When is testing actually required? Industry vs. regulatory views on product testing
  • Testing quality into products vs. using a control strategy as a confirmatory step for the normal process performance
  • Knowing how to implement a clearly articulated control strategy and using the correct QbD terminology in the right format
  • Fully articulating the types of controls and locations, i.e. release tests - to model based controls using a design space
  • Clearly demonstrating what is controlled, how, and where
  • Providing scientific rationale and justification for each control

Dr. Gawayne Mahboubian-Jones, Program Head - Excellence in Science and Design, Philip Morris International Switzerland
12:10
Improving Process Understanding
Evaluation of PAT tools for monitoring and control of a PER.C6® based process
  • Use of multivariate data analysis for exploitation of available data
  • Analysis of industrial datasets characteristics
  • Improvement of process understanding through designed experiments and additional analytical measurements

Sarah Mercier, Scientist USP, Crucell Holland BV Netherlands
12:50
Networking lunch
14:15
Using Mechanistic Understanding to Enhance Process Understanding
Beyond statistical regression of multivariate data sets to quality attributes
  • Understanding “how” and mainly “why” data sets are related in order to achieve mechanistic understanding
  • Converting data into information and understanding multivariate correlations
  • Getting real information vs. being flooded with data sets
  • Understanding how to set up design of experiments with the benefit of a reduced number of experiments by using information parameters instead of raw process parameters
  • Using mechanistic understanding allows: knowledge transfer along development phases and scale up as well as continuous improvement and the extrapolation of knowledge back to process development for platform technologies and the product n+1

Prof. Dr. Christoph Herwig, Research Division Biochemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology,Institute of Chemical Engineering Austria
14:55
Advances in Tools for Enabling QbD
  • Developing approaches to achieve feedback process control
  • Understanding the concept of design space setting
  • Highlighting the available tools and techniques that aid in design space setting
  • PAT for biologics: Transferring the practices used for small molecules across to large molecules
  • Outlining the key challenges of using PAT for large molecules and discussing how these challenges can be overcome
  • Successfully applying the tools and techniques of PAT to biotechnology processes

Dr. Mel Koch, Executive Director, CPAC Centre for Process and Analytical Control (University of Washington) USA
15:35
Implementing Continuous Manufacturing: The Synergy between Plant‐Wide Control, Modeling, and QbD
  • How to use first‐principle modeling in a practical way to enable QbD
  • How to develop a plant‐wide control strategy for a continuous pharmaceutical plant in a systematic and modular fashion
  • Practical experience of the development of a control system for a continuous pharmaceutical pilot plant

Dr.Richard Lakerveld , Associate, Novartis-MIT Center for Continuous Manufacturing USA
16:15
Day one closing remarks and drinks reception

Andreas Schneider, Vice President Life Science Alliances, Roche Diagnostics & Co-Chair Global PAT Data Management Team, ISPE Switzerland
16:25
Networking drinks reception

day one | day two

Day Two25th April 2012
09:00
Refreshments and registration
09:30
Chair's Welcome and review of day one

Andreas Schneider, Vice President Life Science Alliances, Roche Diagnostics & Co-Chair Global PAT Data Management Team, ISPE Switzerland
09:40
Translating Established Development Practice into QbD
Exploiting existing development practice and its transformation into QbD

Dr. Dirk Pamperin, VP R&D , Synthon Pharmaceuticals Netherlands
10:20
Defining a Successful Control Strategy for API-CQAs by Using Quality by Design Principles
Using quality by design principles (ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10) to support development studies to define a control strategy for API critical quality attributes (genotoxic impurities)
  • Indentifying five potential genotoxins by the initial genotox risk assessment (GRA) in development studies of a piperazinylquinaldine, active in the CNS area
  • Using design of experiments (DoE) tools and principal components analysis (PCA) to define process parameters affecting the formation of potential genotoxins and assessing the impact on API quality with the objective of building a robust control strategy

Dr. Zadeo Cimarosti, Manager, API Development and Manufacturing, Verona Aptuit Research Centre Italy
 
From Data to Knowledge Using PAT: Challenges in Bioprocess Development
Using PAT to enhance process understanding
  • Translating a data into information and knowledge to fully realise process benefits using PAT as a valuable information source for process
  • Understanding and fingerprinting in both development and production
  • Embedding PAT data-based process descriptors within monitoring and optimisation algorithms for process to adopt a ‘quality by design concept

Prof. Gary Montague, Professor of Bioprocess Control, Newcastle UniversityUnited Kingdom
 
11:00
Morning Refreshments
11:20
Using Knowledge Management From Development to Manufacturing
Using the A-Mab case study as a blueprint on how to successfully implement knowledge management in a QbD
  • Using data management and information to support knowledge management in pharma
  • Understanding individual steps from early discovery to manufacturing
  • Gaining knowledge in unit operations and using it in quality risk assessment
  • Using technical tools and software to gain knowledge out of data
  • Identifying the gaps in knowledge management
  • Assessing the current status on how to implement QBD

Andreas Schneider, Vice President Life Science Alliances, Roche Diagnostics & Co-Chair Global PAT Data Management Team, ISPE Switzerland
12:00
Using ICH Q10 as the Practical Guideline for Knowledge Management Throughout the Organisation
Using ICH Q10 and knowledge management as a systematic approach to acquiring, analysing, storing, and disseminating information related to products, manufacturing processes and components
  • Understanding Q10 and what it does
  • Using Q10 and knowledge management as an enabler across life cycle stages
  • Linking information across development and manufacturing to support QbD
  • From concept to continual improvement product quality lifecycle implementation (PQLI)

Peter Boogaard, Founder & CEO , Industrial Lab AutomationThe Netherlands
 
Implications of the A-mAb PAT/QbD Case Study – Perspectives for Vaccine Development
Implementing control strategy for bacterial vaccines and mabs
  • What does process understanding imply for biological products?
  • Steps to determine and control process variance for a bioreactor process
  • Explore the design space for a bioreactor process
  • Incorporate PAT tools in a control strategy for a bioreactor process.

Prof. Mathieu Streefland, Assistant Professor Bioprocess Engineering , Wageningen UniversityThe Netherlands
 
12:40
Lunch
14:00
Tools and Platforms for Whole Process Implementations: QbD across Multiple Steps

Dipl Eng. MSc Joao Machado, , 4Tune Engineering Ltd
14:40
Panel: Overcoming QBD Implementation challenges

Andreas Schneider, Vice President Life Science Alliances, Roche Diagnostics & Co-Chair Global PAT Data Management Team, ISPE Switzerland
Dr. Dirk Pamperin, VP R&D , Synthon Pharmaceuticals Netherlands
Peter Boogaard, Founder & CEO , Industrial Lab Automation The Netherlands
Dr. Zadeo Cimarosti, Manager, API Development and Manufacturing, Verona Aptuit Research Centre Italy
Dipl Eng. MSc Joao Machado, , 4Tune Engineering Ltd
Prof. Gary Montague, Professor of Bioprocess Control, Newcastle University United Kingdom
15:40
Chair's Closing Remarks

Andreas Schneider, Vice President Life Science Alliances, Roche Diagnostics & Co-Chair Global PAT Data Management Team, ISPE Switzerland


Event Tools

Add the event dates to your
MS Outlook® Calendar
Add to Calendar

2012 Sponsors include: